AP
David Ignatius‘
gripping novels are quickly emerging as the spy industry’s narcotic for
smart, complex intelligence yarns to read on long flights. His made-for-movies
stories seem to be a hybridized LeCarre with a twist of Michael
Crichton as he reveals tectonic fault lines between an overly
self-confident, reckless America and a fragmented, in spots
radicalized, almost always misunderstood Islamic world.
His latest novel,
Bloodmoney: A Novel of Espionage,
has recently appeared in paperback and should be required reading for
wannabe strategists who want a glimpse of how messy and convulsive the
future is probably going to be. America will remain a big, important
power into the foreseeable future, but a myriad of new players pushing
back on U.S. institutions and interests heighten the complexity and
danger for a declining superpower holding tightly to anachronistic global arrangements.
Ignatius, long-time national security columnist for the
Washington Post and author as well of the novel-turned-movie Body of Lies,
makes an important policy point via fiction that ‘the other guys’ — in
this case, vengeance-driven Pakistanis who have legitimate grievances
against a drone-lobbing America — will one day have the technology and
systems sophistication to to turn the West’s military and economic
assets against it.
Bloodmoney
probably should have been called Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire, but that title was already taken by the late Chalmers Johnson
who wrote a pre-9/11 treatise arguing that American hubris, its global
sprawl of US military bases, and influence-machinery around the world
were going to trigger push-back, or blowback as it were, from states no
longer wanting to play by U.S. rules in a post-Cold War World —
eventually leading to a cataclysmic event.
One of the cases Johnson starts with in the book was the
1993 murder of CIA employees at a stoplight near the entrance to the Central Intelligence Agency by an aggrieved Pakistani man, Aimal Qazi, who was upset about American policy towards Palestinians.
When the terror strikes by al Qaeda hit Washington, New York, and rural Pennsylvania on September 11, 2001, Johnson’s Blowback became the most difficult in-print but out of stock book to get. The publisher could not keep the fast-selling, prescient books on the shelves.
Ignatius’ novel starts out on a similar track to this real world event,
opening with a US clandestine drone wiping out an innocent family —
mother and father, siblings, and nieces and nephews — of an unusually
smart tribal youth from South Waziristan, Pakistan. The youth, Omar,
was the West’s dream kid — moving via educational opportunity from the
backward, tribal pool of an ignorant, terrorist-generating culture, to
modernity — becoming a globally-aware, traveled, and in the Western
sense, rational person. (drone photo credit: Reuters)
Ignatius’ Omar is a mathematical wunderkind who not only escaped the geographic gravitational forces of his Pashtun tribe but became an academic consulting to the world’s spy agencies who wanted to know more about the world he came from. This fictional fabrication again tracks closely with real life.
Like some others from Pakistan and Afghanistan who have quietly and deeply buried their grievances with the West — perhaps because of religion, or the loss of loved ones due to the military operations of the U.S. and its allies — and bided their time until they were in important military and intelligence operations only to eventually explode killing their duped allies, Omar is committed to achieving a ‘calibrated revenge’ against those who killed his family.
I won’t reveal more of the plot, but I want to raise a few of the themes and nods that Ignatius weaves into this smart page-turner.
First of all, the West may be deceiving itself that education and roads, modernity writ large, will be a quick fix correcting ancient behavioral norms and codes written deeply into the DNA of tribal groups — in this case Pashtun tribes but certainly not limited to them.
Ignatius’ protagonist killer in the book is a professor possessed by deep impulses to avenge his family’s murder.
Ignatius’ portrait of Omar defies easy typecasting as he sits between primitive and turbo-charged modern worlds; interestingly, Ignatius positions him at the end of the novel to be the one most ready to see a way back to ‘balance’, or a deal that would end the killing and restore calm.
None of the other personalities in the book — not the head of Pakistan’s ISI, or the operatives of an off-the-books intelligence operation, or the spymasters running the CIA — could understand that Omar could choose to stop his successful campaign and might strike an arrangement. Ignatius is telling us that American policymakers still don’t understand what could be achieved with the Taliban — that it’s not just a tug of war between a Pashtun uber alles formula or obliterating them.
Secondly, Ignatius has subtly taken sides in the novel, and surprisingly it’s with the victimized Pakistani. Omar, driven by understandable outrage, hit above his weight and achieved an intellectual and technical sophistication besting his adversaries. The Americans in the novel arrogantly thought it would be impossible for anyone from relatively primitive circumstances in tribal zones in Pakistan to develop the capacity to challenge the U.S. and Western allies in the way Omar did. Ignatius reminds the reader that technology and innovation are globally accessible today and that neither the US nor any power have a monopoly on technological or economic innovation.
In other words, Ignatius warns that weapons technology — and complex financial instruments and structures — will not remain the sole preserve of the U.S. and its allies. What we throw at them may come back and be deployed against us.
The pattern and link analysis that the Department of Treasury, National Security Agency, CIA, FBI, and other parts of the intelligence industrial complex have used with great effect to target terrorists and influence the behavior of thuggish officials in problematic nations, like Iran, North Korea, and Syria, could conceivably be acquired by our rivals.
While the US is today preparing to further expand its drone force and as of late arm Italian drones, Iran is now trying to develop its own drones. So too it seems China and Russia.
The question that President Obama, who has admitted direct, routenized involvement in creating the drone ‘kill list‘, should ponder is what will happen as the barriers to entry on drone technology fall enough so that an adversary’s drones can be deployed against U.S. and allied forces and interests.
The key message behind David Ignatius’s interesting book is that day is probably coming sooner than most think.
— Steve Clemons is Washington Editor at Large at The Atlantic, where this post first appeared. Clemons can be followed on Twitter at @SCClemons
