One of the best investigative journalists who has been reporting on America’s wars is Seymour Hersh. Hersh has been consistently ahead of the pack — revealing hard-to-believe atrocities far before the political marketplace was often ready or willing to accept his reporting.
The extraordinary posting on WikiLeaks of more than 92,000 classified documents on America’s military activities in Afghanistan and Pakistan confirms Hersh’s claims of battlefield executions and death squads.
Besides Hersh, The New Yorker‘s key commentators on Afghanistan have been Steve Coll, George Packer, and Hendrick Hertzberg.
I am a big fan of all of these brilliant writers. However, although these generalizations may be unfair to them and may overstate, Coll, and Packer have been mostly in the camp of supporting the administration’s general course in Afghanistan and Pakistan — though there are exceptions in the portfolios of each. Hertzberg has been a cautious skeptic of the administration — and Hersh has been the most dramatically revealing of America’s self-deception about success in the Afghan War.
Given what has just been released in this disturbing dump of classified documents, we hope that The New Yorker encourages Hersh to get back on this beat and into the field soon on this stuff.
— Steve Clemons
6 comments on “Seymour Hersh, the Afghanistan War WikiLeaks, and Getting the Real Story”