Debt Deal Drama: Obama Loses; Jim DeMint Big Winner


DeMint_370x278.jpgSenator Jim DeMint was not one of the major political players whose every move we watched this weekend, but he was the animator of much of the high stakes drama over raising the debt ceiling and cutting the national debt.  DeMint has been the driver of the ‘never give up, never surrender’ drum beat of the largely freshman class of Tea Party conservatives in both the Senate and the House.  DeMint provided muscle and counsel to Republican Majority Leader Eric Cantor in his posturing during this debate.

House Speaker John Boehner, Senate Republican Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and President Obama and Vice President Biden have essentially been negotiating with the DeMint camp through proxies — making DeMint, for the moment anyway, the most powerful, albeit behind the scenes, political figure in the country next to the President.

Details of the so-called “debt deal” are still emerging, but as line
item wins and losses are tallied, the President won almost nothing of
significance and the GOP won the day on substantive deliverables. (Major Garrett on wins and losses.)

According to the Associated Press’ David Espo,
the President won time in not having another debt standoff until after
the 2012 election.  The White House also said the Department of Defense
could face cuts — which it was facing anyway — and while this is a
loss for Team DeMint, it gets to paint Obama as an anti-Pentagon
national security weakling vs. the more muscular right.

According to Espo, Obama has reportedly conceded not extending the
current payroll tax holiday beyond 2011.  Happy holidays folks. And more
disturbingly, Team DeMint secured the expiration of unemployment
benefits for victims of the recession.

And what of those once-temporary Bush tax cuts for the rich.  They stay, at least so far.

Obama-supporters are saying that they have averted disaster by giving
DeMint, Eric Cantor and their Tea Party comrades a “vote” on a balanced
budget amendment sometime in the last three months of 2011 — rather
than allowing an increase in the debt ceiling to be tied to the
guaranteed passage of such a Constitutional amendment.  Most analysts
believe that such an amendment would cripple the ability of the nation
to deal with significant economic crises and downturns.  Such an
amendment would have preempted entirely the stimulus package —
organized by the George W. Bush administration to the greatest economic
shock to hit the US economy since the Great Depression.

But bottom line is that the Tea Party patriots got a vote on the balanced budget amendment, and President Obama got nothing. 

And most dramatically not on the Obama vs DeMint & Co tally sheet
are revenue increases — which Dems are today saying they will renew a
push for later this year.

John Boehner lost in this debt squeeze standoff by allowing himself to
be repeatedly tripped up and undermined by his own team.  Eric Cantor
wins and looks today ever stronger to eventually succeed the worried and
wobbly speakership of Boehner.

But the Commander in Chief of the operation, the one who threatened
Senators who voted for any package that included tax increases (aka
revenue increases), who got Tea Party and other conservative
organizations to call and threaten House Members who went along with
Boehner’s first two or three plans, the one who scripted Eric Cantor’s
high drama moments quitting the talks, who continued to run the
resistance against the Boehner plan even when Cantor finally joined up
with his leader to gin up votes, was Senator Jim DeMint.

Barack Obama’s playbook is now understood by the DeMint team.  Obama
prides himself on doing whatever needs to be done to govern, to
compromise, to do the wrenching, hard negotiating to get to a deal.  One
of Obama’s chief strategists once told me that there are many on the
left who want Obama to be more ideologically committed, to take a stand
out of principle and stay there — but in the end, this adviser said,
“the American people want to see a President who governs and gets things

The problem with that formulation is that Obama’s opponents know that
their best strategy is to stonewall, resist, defect, defame, and say no
to everything.  It creates the impression that Obama and Dems concede
defeat and Republicans declare victory before the battle has even really

Barack Obama had a chance to demonstrate that he had a little FDR in him
— by taking the recalcitrance of the DeMint camp and crushing it
through executive authority, by triggering the authorities of the Fourteenth Amendment
in the Constitution — and forcing a great national fight over the
system of checks and balances between branches of government. 

Bill Clinton would have done the same.  Reagan too I think.  LBJ and FDR
also.  But fundamentally, Obama chose muddling through, conceding to
the hard core fiscal right — only to assure that Senator Jim DeMint’s
hard-edged and politically hungry team will engage in similar battles
with the White House over and over and over again.
— Steve Clemons is Washington Editor at Large at The Atlantic, where this post first appeared. Clemons can be followed on Twitter at @SCClemons


Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *