Open Thread: Surgery Today

-

annieoakleyusd1.jpg
Annie and Oakley the Amazing Weimaraners send their best. I know, it’s blurry.
I’m going to have some oral surgery this morning — please be nice while I’m away and nice knowing all of you if it doesn’t go well.
If I’m not ticked off at the world, I’m scheduled to hear James Fallows speak on China at lunch at a forum hosted by The Atlantic — and the later to hear Bob Gates at the annual JINSA dinner. Yep, I’ll be there. . .listening.
— Steve Clemons

Comments

13 comments on “Open Thread: Surgery Today

  1. Cynthia says:

    I just found your site and hope your surgery came out great. I saw the photo of the two weimer’s and I almost cried. I had 4 and they were so very special and I wish I could have another, but now have to live in an apt. building and no pets. I was standing at a pedestrian crosswalk waiting for the light to change in April 2001 and was hit by a van that was hit by a hit and run and my frontal lobe went through the windshield and pulverized my left knee, etc., and they said I landed 50 feet in a parking lot. The one who hit the van and ran, was Rubin Otero, an illegal immigrant from Mexico, 20, with NO license, NO social Security and NO ins., paid good and paid NO taxes. They dismissed four of the 5 counts with me having a life long disability and all they charged him with was tampering with the evidence. Yep, that’s our legal system and government for you. I got no help, he was let go!!! I have Complex PTSD just like the soilders I volunteered with in the 80’s who came home from the Vietnam War and now know exactly what they were and still are going through and TBI-Traumatic Brain Injury which a lot are coming home from THIS war with. I stay inside now and paint. Lamar Alexander, Bill Frist while he was still in the house and others, even the Governor would not speak to me, answer letters, e-mails. Swept everything under the carpet. I wish on my tiny disability I could afford to send them all brooms with red, white and blue ribbon tied on so they can do what they do best…Sweep it all under the carpet. Even a year and a half before I was hit, I had my left amygdala and hippocampus removed and was seizure free for the first time in my life and never healthier. Three weeks from moving to Colorado because I loved hiking, skiing, and my art. Now, can no longer do that due to my leg. But I love helping at the Children’s Hospital and visiting at the VA Hospital here. Thank you.

    Reply

  2. Sandy says:

    Feel better soon, Steve! We wouldn’t want you eating that stuff anyway! : )
    Your doggies are delightful!

    Reply

  3. sab says:

    One worries about sibling rivalry when introducing a new dog to an existing dog or pack. Apparently Oakley made his adjustment with a certain enthusiasm. He was just a dog-pack waiting to happen.

    Reply

  4. Steve Clemons says:

    Folks — I said I was going to the JINSA Dinner, but now I’m having to cancel. My surgery went OK — but I’m in a lot of pain still…so am going to ease out of that. I’ll look and see if DoD posts Bob Gates’ comments, which is what I most wanted to see.
    Steve Clemons

    Reply

  5. Carroll says:

    To see what is in front of one’s nose needs a constant struggle…. by George Orwell.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Uri Avnery’s Column
    “The Mother of all Pretexts”
    13/10/07
    WHEN I hear mention of the “Clash of Civilizations” I don’t know whether to laugh or to cry.
    To laugh, because it is such a silly notion.
    To cry, because it is liable to cause untold disasters.
    To cry even more, because our leaders are exploiting this slogan as a pretext for sabotaging any possibility of an Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation. It is just one more in a long line of pretexts.
    WHY WAS the Zionist movement in need of excuses to justify the way it treated the Palestinian people?
    At its birth, it was an idealistic movement. It laid great weight on its moral basis. Not just in order to convince the world, but above all in order to set its own conscience at rest.
    From early childhood we learned about the pioneers, many of them sons and daughters of well-to-do and well-educated families, who left behind a comfortable life in Europe in order to start a new life in a far-away and – by the standards of the time – primitive country. Here, in a savage climate they were not used to, often hungry and sick, they performed bone-breaking physical labor under a brutal sun.
    For that, they needed an absolute belief in the rightness of their cause. Not only did they believe in the need to save the Jews of Europe from persecution and pogroms, but also in the creation of a society so just as never seen before, an egalitarian society that would be a model for the entire world. Leo Tolstoy was no less important for them than Theodor Herzl. The kibbutz and the moshav were symbols of the whole enterprise.
    But this idealistic movement aimed at settling in a country inhabited by another people. How to bridge this contradiction between its sublime ideals and the fact that their realization necessitated the expulsion of the people of the land?
    The easiest way was to repress the problem altogether, ignoring its very existence: the land, we told ourselves, was empty, there was no people living here at all. That was the justification that served as a bridge over the moral abyss.
    Only one of the Founding Fathers of the Zionist movement was courageous enough to call a spade a spade. Ze’ev Jabotinsky wrote as early as 80 years ago that it was impossible to deceive the Palestinian people (whose existence he recognized) and to buy their consent to the Zionist aspirations. We are white settlers colonizing the land of the native people, he said, and there is no chance whatsoever that the natives will resign themselves to this voluntarily. They will resist violently, like all the native peoples in the European colonies. Therefore we need an “Iron Wall” to protect the Zionist enterprise.
    When Jabotinsky was told that his approach was immoral, he replied that the Jews were trying to save themselves from the disaster threatening them in Europe, and, therefore, their morality trumped the morality of the Arabs in Palestine.
    Most Zionists were not prepared to accept this force-oriented approach. They searched fervently for a moral justification they could live with.
    Thus started the long quest for justifications – with each pretext supplanting the previous one, according to the changing spiritual fashions in the world.
    Pretext Number One
    THE FIRST justification was precisely the one mocked by Jabotinsky: we were actually coming to benefit the Arabs. We shall redeem them from their primitive living conditions, from ignorance and disease. We shall teach them modern methods of agriculture and bring them advanced medicine. Everything – except employment, because we needed every job for the Jews we were bringing here, which we were transforming from ghetto-Jews into a people of workers and tillers of the soil.
    Pretext Number Two
    When the ungrateful Arabs went on to resist our grand project, in spite of all the benefits we were supposedly bringing them, we found a Marxist justification: It’s not the Arabs who oppose us, but only the “effendis”. The rich Arabs, the great landowners, are afraid that the glowing example of the egalitarian Hebrew community would attract the exploited Arab proletariat and cause them to rise against their oppressors.
    That, too, did not work for long, perhaps because the Arabs saw how the Zionists bought the land from those very same “effendis” and drove out the tenants who had been cultivating it for generations.
    Pretext Number Three
    The rise of the Nazis in Europe brought masses of Jews to the country. The Arab public saw how the land was being withdrawn from under their feet, and started a rebellion against the British and the Jews in 1936. Why, the Arabs asked, should they pay for the persecution of the Jews by the Europeans? But the Arab Revolt gave us a new justification: “the Arabs support the Nazis.” And indeed, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, was photographed sitting next to Hitler. Some people “discovered” that the Mufti was the real instigator of the Holocaust. (Years later it was revealed that Hitler had detested the Mufti, who had no influence whatsoever over the Nazis.)
    Pretext Number Four
    World War II came to an end, to be followed by the 1948 war. Half of the vanquished Palestinian people became refugees. That did not trouble the Zionist conscience, because everybody knew: “They ran away of their own free will.” Their leaders had called upon them to leave their homes, to return later with the victorious Arab armies. True, no evidence was ever found to support this absurd claim, but it has sufficed to soothe our conscience to this day.
    Pretext Number Five
    It may be asked: why were the refugees not allowed to come back to their homes once the war was over? Well, “it was they who in 1947 rejected the UN partition plan and started the war. If because of this they lost 78% of their country, they have only themselves to blame.”
    Pretext Number Six
    Then came the Cold War. We were, of course, on the side of the “Free World”, while the great Arab leader, Gamal Abd-al-Nasser, got his weapons from the Soviet bloc. (True, in the 1948 war the Soviet arms flowed to us, but that’s not important.) It was quite clear: “No use talking with the Arabs, because they support Communist tyranny.”
    Pretext Number Seven- the Clash of Civilizations
    But the Soviet bloc collapsed. “The terrorist organization called PLO”, as Menachem Begin used to call it, recognized Israel and signed the Oslo agreement. A new justification had to be found for our unwillingness to give back the occupied territories to the Palestinian people.
    The salvation came from America: a professor named Samuel Huntington wrote a book about the “Clash of Civilizations”. *And so we found the mother of all pretexts.
    THE ARCH-ENEMY, according to this theory, is Islam. Western Civilization, Judeo-Christian, liberal, democratic, tolerant, is under attacked from the Islamic monster, fanatical, terrorist, murderous.
    Islam is murderous by nature. Actually, “Muslim” and “terrorist” are synonymous. Every Muslim is a terrorist, every terrorist a Muslim.
    A sceptic might ask: How did it happen that the wonderful Western culture gave birth to the Inquisition, the pogroms, the burning of witches, the annihilation of the Native Americans, the Holocaust, the ethnic cleansings and other atrocities without number – but that was in the past. Now Western culture is the embodiment of freedom and progress.
    Professor Huntington was not thinking about us in particular. His task was to satisfy a peculiar American craving: the American empire always needs a virtual, world-embracing enemy, a single enemy which includes all the opponents of the United States around the world. The Communists delivered the goods – the whole world was divided between Good Guys (the Americans and their supporters) and Bad Guys (the Commies). Everybody who opposed American interests was automatically a Communist – Nelson Mandela in South Africa, Salvador Allende in Chile, Fidel Castro in Cuba, while the masters of Apartheid, the death squads of Augusto Pinochet and the secret police of the Shah of Iran belonged, like us, to the Free World.
    When the Communist empire collapsed, America was suddenly left without a world-wide enemy. This vacuum has now been filled by the Muslims-Terrorists. Not only Osama bin Laden, but also the Chechnyan freedom fighters, the angry North-African youth of the Paris banlieus, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, the insurgents in the Philippines.
    Thus the American world view rearranged itself: a good world (Western Civilization) and a bad world (Islamic civilization). Diplomats still take care to make a distinction between “radical Islamists” and “moderate Muslims”, but that is only for appearances’ sake. Between ourselves, we know of course that they are all Osama bin Ladens. They are all the same.
    This way, a huge part of the world, composed of manifold and very different countries, and a great religion, with many different and even opposing tendencies (like Christianity, like Judaism), which has given the world unmatched scientific and cultural treasures, is thrown into one and the same pot.
    THIS WORLD VIEW is tailored for us. Indeed, the world of the clashing civilizations is, for us, the best of all possible worlds.
    The struggle between Israel and the Palestinians is no longer a conflict between the Zionist movement, which came to settle in this country, and the Palestinian people, which inhabited it. No, it has been from the very beginning a part of a world-wide struggle which does not stem from our aspirations and actions. The assault of terrorist Islam on the Western world did not start because of us. Our conscience can be entirely clean – we are among the good guys of this world.
    This is now the line of argument of official Israel: the Palestinians elected Hamas, a murderous Islamic movement. (If it didn’t exist, it would have to be invented – and indeed, some people assert it was created from the start by our secret service.) Hamas is terroristic, and so is Hizbullah. Perhaps Mahmoud Abbas is not a terrorist himself, but he is weak and Hamas is about to take sole control over all Palestinian territories. So we cannot talk with them. We have no partner. Actually, we cannot possibly have a partner, because we belong to Western Civilization, which Islam wants to eradicate.
    IN HIS book “Der Judenstaat”, Theodor Herzl, the official Israeli “Prophet of the State”, prophesied this development, too.
    This is what he wrote in 1896: “For Europe we shall constitute (in Palestine) a part of the wall against Asia, we shall serve as a vanguard of culture against barbarism.”
    Herzl was thinking of a metaphoric wall, but in the meantime we have put up a very real one. For many, this is not just a Separation Wall between Israel and Palestine. It is a part of the world-wide wall between the West and Islam, the front-line of the Clash of Civilizations. Beyond the wall there are not men, women and children, not a conquered and oppressed Palestinian population, not choked towns and villages like Abu-Dis, a-Ram, Bil’in and Qalqilia. No, beyond the wall there are a billion terrorists, multitudes of blood-thirsty Muslims, who have only one desire in life: to throw us into the sea, simply because we are Jews, part of Judeo-Christian Civilization.
    With an official position like that – who is there to talk to? What is there to talk about? What is the point of meeting in Annapolis or anywhere else?
    And what is left to us to do – to cry or to laugh?

    Reply

  6. Thom says:

    Hope it went well. Get ungrumpy soon.

    Reply

  7. ... says:

    i hope all goes well with the surgery steve and you are back up and running soon.

    Reply

  8. Kathleen says:

    As someone who has been ridiculing Pavlovian Patriots for wearing little flag lapel pins, ever since 9/11 when the fashion became des rigeurs, I was glad to see this piece by Bill Maher. An idea whose time has come, perhaps??
    American Flag Pins Are For Idiots
    by Bill Maher
    Show me a man wearing an American flag pin in his lapel, and IÂ’ll show you an asshole. IÂ’m sure there are exceptions, but in general people need to remember that lapels arenÂ’t for wearing pins to create the illusion that youÂ’re supporting the troops. TheyÂ’re for wearing ribbons to create the illusion that youÂ’re helping cure a disease.
    Last week we had the first genuine controversy of the presidential campaign: the shocking news that Barack Obama doesn’t wear an American flag lapel pin, so apparently he and America are no longer going steady. “No lapel pin, Senator? It’s like not wearing pants. Why don’t you just stab the Statue of Liberty in the eye while bitch-slapping a 9/11 widow?” Another in a series of bullshit non-stories that have zero effect on the troops, the war or anything in the real world — or, as Fox calls it, “Breaking News.”
    A reporter in Iowa asked Obama why he doesn’t wear the pin and Obama explained that, to him, wearing the pin had come to seem like a “substitute for true patriotism.” Bravo, Senator. And then, in yet another shining example of why the media is part of the problem, ABC’s Claire Shipman said, “TMI, too much information — all he had to say was, ‘Don’t judge me by what I wear, move on.’ He played into the idea that he’s not ready for prime time.”
    What, schoolgirl? “Too much information?” What is she, 12? This is typical press hypocrisy — they say they want somebody who doesn’t give pat political answers, but when they get one, they call him a loser. They say they don’t like safe robots like Hillary, but they create conditions where only that species can survive. And they give cover to people like Sean Hannity, who reported on “no pin” gate and then had to call a doctor because his fake outrage hard-on lasted longer than 72 hours.
    Of course, the Republicans are the party of Mark Foley and the Rev. Ted Haggard and Larry Craig and countless other closeted homosexuals, so their fixation on jewelry is understandable, but still Â… the flag is just a symbol. YouÂ’re getting pissy about a brooch, you drama queens, one that was probably made in China. ItÂ’s probably leaking poison lead on you right now.
    At least that would be some sacrifice, because letÂ’s be honest: this generation doesnÂ’t do real sacrifice or even pay for our own wars. ThatÂ’s what grandkids are for! No, we do flag pins and bumper stickers. And not even bumper stickers. Bumper magnets. Because stickers are tough to get off, and we may change our mind about never forgetting.
    When I see the little flag right here, the first thing I think is, you voted for, and still like, George Bush, the man who has gotten more troops unnecessarily killed and maimed by failing to plan for their mission, by pushing their units to the breaking point, by letting his corporate enablers like Halliburton, Bechtel and Blackwater rape and pillage not just the Iraqis, but our own army.
    Can you imagine how apoplectic the flag-pin people would be if these same transgressions against the military were being made by Bill Clinton? Oh, who am I kidding? TheyÂ’d still be obsessing about the blow job.
    Bill Maher is a comedian, commentator, and host of Real Time With Bill Maher on HBO.
    It’s the idiot, stooopid. Welcome to Pavlovia.

    Reply

  9. Carroll says:

    Arise America.
    Frank Rich on the ‘Good German’:
    … Our moral trajectory over the Bush years could not be better dramatized than it was by a reunion of an elite group of two dozen World War II veterans in Washington this month. They were participants in a top-secret operation to interrogate some 4,000 Nazi prisoners of war. Until now, they have kept silent, but America’s recent record prompted them to talk to The Washington Post.
    “We got more information out of a German general with a game of chess or Ping-Pong than they do today, with their torture,” said Henry Kolm, 90, an M.I.T. physicist whose interrogation of Rudolf Hess, Hitler’s deputy, took place over a chessboard. George Frenkel, 87, recalled that he “never laid hands on anyone” in his many interrogations, adding, “I’m proud to say I never compromised my humanity.”
    Our humanity has been compromised by those who use Gestapo tactics in our war. The longer we stand idly by while they do so, the more we resemble those “good Germans” who professed ignorance of their own Gestapo. It’s up to us to wake up our somnambulant Congress to challenge administration policy every day. Let the war’s last supporters filibuster all night if they want to. There is nothing left to lose except whatever remains of our country’s good name.
    Posted by Laura at 09:51 AM

    Reply

  10. Carroll says:

    Oral surgery and JINSA?..Ask for lots of good drugs.

    Reply

  11. liz says:

    Since I recently requested a new shot of Annie and Oakley, I wanted to send my sincere thanks . Steve, I love your dogs….. that’s part of why I read your blog! Only kidding.
    Hope things go well at the oral docs… Remember Salt water mouth rinses really really help.

    Reply

  12. Kathleen says:

    Well I definitely sympathize… this is the year of the dentist for me. It never turns out to be as bad as your imagination, so you’ll back in the saddle before you know it.

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *