James Galbraith: Missing the Point about 2004

-

When Steve Clemons first asked me to contribute to The Washington Note this week, my reaction was to decline, on the ground of fatigue following an intense few weeks — as many of you know, the memorial service for my father was held on May 31st. However I find the temptation to say a few words irresistible.
Robert F. Kennedy jr. has created a stir with this story in Rolling Stone. Kennedy presents a useful survey of the many abusive tactics and acts of seeming incompetence that marred the administration of the 2004 election, especially in Ohio. Kennedy goes on to conclude that these abuses were numerically large enough to have thrown the election from Kerry to Bush, and for this he has been attacked quite thoroughly by Farhad Manjoo in Salon.
Without getting into back-and-forth of this argument, it seems to me that it is largely beside the point. Manjoo writes that “to prove [Ohio Secretary of State] Blackwell stole the state for Bush, Kennedy’s got to do more than show instances of Blackwell’s mischief. He’s got to outline were Blackwell’s actions could possibly have added up to enough votes to put the wrong man in office.”
This is correct, but a red herring, induced by a strategic error on Kennedy’s part. Kennedy did not need to prove that Kerry really won Ohio. And he should not have attempted to do so. It makes no difference now. George Bush is President and the outcome of the election cannot be changed.
And yet, attempted burglary is a serious crime. It does not matter whether the victim was picked clean. The systematic suppression of the votes of blacks, Hispanics and the young is a huge insult to the election process. It is by itself enough to rob an election of legitimacy. It doesn’t matter whether it did actually change the outcome. The point is, it might have.
Was there such systematic suppression of (for instance) the minority vote? Manjoo agrees there was, quoting a study of Franklin County (Columbus) showing that “the allocation of voting machines was clearly biased against African-Americans.” I witnessed the two-hour lines that were everywhere in the Democratic wards of Columbus that day. I spoke with voters who were deterred from voting because of the lines. And I saw numerous voters turn away from an overcrowded polling place at the end of the day.
People, this is a crime. It’s not a small issue. The right to vote should not be restricted to those who have two hours to spare in order to do it! Time is money, and a wait of that order is exactly like a poll tax, against which the civil rights movement struggled for years.
Many who fret over electronic voting worry — with good reason — over the possibility that the machines can be hacked, though there is no firm proof they actually have been. But machines are a serious problem in a more obvious way, affecting every election. They are a bottleneck to voting.
If a precinct has less machines than it needs, the number of people who can vote in that precinct is automatically limited to the flow-capacity of the machines. When this happens, as it certainly did in Columbus, Ohio in 2004, get-out-the-vote efforts are automatically frustrated. It is easy to fix an election, in practice, by rationing the number of votes that precincts on one side or another can cast. That’s what happened in Ohio. Whether it was by design or incompetence, whether it made enough difference to change the outcome — it doesn’t matter. If large numbers cannot get in to vote, the election is illegitimate on its face.
Manjoo rightly asks for solutions. The right one is to get rid of the machines. That’s what Vote-By-Mail — the Oregon system — achieves. Vote By Mail is tested, popular, effective, efficient and safe. It is not a partisan measure. Where elections are clean there is no reason to think it will favor one party over another. But where vote suppression is a critical element of Republican electoral tactics, Vote By Mail will make a difference. And that could make all the difference in the outcome going forward.
This issue is the central civil rights question of our time, and it’s time to get on it.
James K. Galbraith teaches economics and a variety of other subjects at the LBJ School at the University of Texas. He wrote an article on election reform for The Nation in November 2004.

Comments

9 comments on “James Galbraith: Missing the Point about 2004

  1. wow power leveling says:

    you’re going to dish dirt on me you’ll need to be original. I have already written a book about my felonious past. I outed myself, so to speak so there is nothing revelatory about these so-called factoids. The book is called News Junkie. It was published last week.
    http://www.wowgold-powerleveling.com

    Reply

  2. Hydrocodone says:

    Welcome to Great Blog here!

    Reply

  3. ladlespoon says:

    Pissed,
    You Gott it all wrong. God ain’t busy rigging the elections, He merely gives His elect on Earth, in God’s Country, His blessing to do all in their power to secure the Kingdom of God upon Earth through His son Jesus Christ the Savior of the world. Christ can and will forgive any trespass that is entered into with the sincere purpose of bringing Him greater glory. All is allowed if done in Jesus’ name. There is a time for EVERYTHING under heaven, and stealing elections away from Evil is verily one of those things.
    All Praise Goes to Jesus.

    Reply

  4. Pissed Off American says:

    God does not care if His people steal elections for His greater glory. It is written, bottom line.
    All Praise Goes to Jesus.
    PS: I still don’t think you guys know who or what you are up against.
    Posted by onward
    Well, when God gets through helping Cheney waterboard and sodomize a Muslim or two, could you ask him if he’d give us a hand in Palestine??? They aren’t dying fast enough there, and we could sure use an epidemic or an earthquake.
    (But only if he’s not too busy riggin’ the mid-terms. After all, first things first.)

    Reply

  5. daCascadian says:

    onward >”…I still don’t think you guys know who or what you are up against.”
    You have no clue what “We the people…” know & it shows
    Thugs always think they are above it all
    “…Churches have given us great treasures. Whether that pays for the harm they have done is another matter.” – Daniel C. Dennett

    Reply

  6. onward says:

    God does not care if His people steal elections for His greater glory. It is written, bottom line.
    All Praise Goes to Jesus.
    PS: I still don’t think you guys know who or what you are up against.

    Reply

  7. Grok This says:

    It’s recently come to light that a group of private investers in Venezuela own the company who produces the Sequoia voting machines and software used in some areas of the U.S. They have the claim of proprietary software and trade secrets, so election officials, even the Secretaries of State where they’re used, have no way to audit or challenge the election results determined by these machines.
    James Galbraith says there’s been no firm proof that any voting machines can be hacked, but it’s exactly this that concerns me. Without access to the underlying software, we can never prove that they can, or can’t. Elections shouldn’t be assumed to be honest and accurate, they should be proven to be. Now, on top of all our other concerns, we have to worry about foreign investors controlling the software.
    More info on the Sequoia machines and the Venezuelan company here:
    http://www.pogowasright.org/blogs/grokthis/?p=4
    and in this CNN transcript of Lou Dobbs’ 6/6 program
    http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/06/ldt.01.html

    Reply

  8. daCascadian says:

    Bravo !
    Excellent point(s) & excellent framing of THE issue
    Here is something about the 2000 Florida Disaster to consider; after you have the votes how do you handle them ? :
    (http://www.rinr.fsu.edu/winter2005/features/battlefield.html)
    “Eventually, the truth will emerge. And when it does, this house of cards, built of deceit, will fall.” – Robert C. Byrd

    Reply

  9. chris from boca says:

    thank you. finally, a well respected proponent of fair elections points out the issue of electoral legitimacy. democrats want it and republicans don’t. it’s that plain and simple. it is the most important issue of our time, not just as regards civil rights. it is the black box from which all of pandora’s other machinations stem.

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *