Daddy Bush Shocked at Son’s Driving

-

Bush Dad & Son.jpg
A friend sent me this picture which captures the concern of many Bush 41 administration realists with the decisions and driving of the country by Bush 43.

— Steve Clemons

Comments

17 comments on “Daddy Bush Shocked at Son’s Driving

  1. pauline says:

    Be on Alert for the October Surprise
    “To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.” President Theodore Roosevelt
    by Ed Haas
    October 4, 2006
    To describe the Bush Administration as being in a state of denial regarding its many ruinous policies is far too kind. For Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice, along with their neo con co-conspirators in the U.S. Congress, denial of their miserable failures isn’t an indication of obstinacy or incompetence, although the entire swarm is infected with both. Denial, along with terror, is the camouflage of choice to conceal their deceit. Denial is a tactic, not a state of mind for the Bush Administration.
    Deceit is the deflector that redirects, rather than reflects, their dishonest rhetoric, and there has been no shortage of deceit overflowing the sewer beneath Bush’s nose the past few weeks. Stomaching the stench is becoming unbearable. However, as is the case with any other disease, understanding the pathology can give rise to hope.
    In a series of speeches meant to keep the already proven false terror assertion part of the Iraq War debate leading up to the November 2006 elections, Bush has been relentless in his pursuit to deceive enough foolish Americans into supporting the neo con for two more years. He wants the public to believe that the problems in Iraq are the result of terrorists, when the overwhelming number of attacks on U.S. forces in that country are the result of patriotic Iraqis, people like you and me, taking up arms against an occupying foreign military that they simply want out of their country.
    Yes, there are elements of jihadists that have recognized the bulls eye Bush has painted on the chests of the U.S. military personnel stationed in Iraq, but these real terrorists are small in number compared to the average Iraqi that is fighting for his country to be freed of the U.S. military occupation.
    Just image what Americans would be doing right now if we had Chinese forces occupying our nation. If you think that rednecks, roughnecks, gangsters, and thugs wouldn�t be rigging improvised explosive devices and setting up ambushes and sniper nests, then it is you that is in denial. Our resistance to the occupation would be medieval and fierce.
    Remember Cheney saying, “We’ll be greeted as liberators in Iraq”? If the U.S. ever has its own brutal dictator that needs to be overthrown by foreign military forces, and those forces overstay their welcome, how do you think Americans would respond? Would you continue to greet such a military as liberators once you realized that they were occupiers? Bush and Cheney apparently would!
    God willing, this time the neo cons will fail. However, it would be naive to believe that the neo con criminals will stop at rhetoric if they sense they will need something bigger to protect Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice from prosecution for their criminal acts and violence on the world stage.
    The October surprise that Karl Rove and company might now have to employ to save the Bush cartel is another terror attack on U.S. soil. With the release of Bob Woodward’s book, “State of Denial”, and the Congressman Foley scandal regarding the sexual harassment of teenage male congressional pages, Bush is left with two choices; return to his fabricated and fantasy strength, fighting terrorists, or massive voter fraud through the neo con instigated, Black Box Voting apparatus. It is possible that the neo con strategy at this point might be to employ both tactics.
    Woodward’s book has brought a very important topic to the forefront of corporate media reporting the fact that the Bush Administration had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. This isn’t news for the tens of millions of Americans that get their news from independent news sources. We have known this for years. Having prior knowledge of mass murder and mayhem, yet doing nothing to prevent it, is a felony. There is enough evidence to convict Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice of this crime, yet not one federal prosecutor or state attorney general has yet to even gather and evaluate the available evidence. The complete lack of prosecutorial pursuit in this regard is further evidence of how corrupt and deceitful the United States has become under neo con rule.
    The fact that the Bush Administration had prior knowledge of the 9/11 events and chose to conceal rather than warn the public is all the evidence required to conclude that they are capable of letting another terror attack unfold in the United States, or even facilitate the event themselves.
    Fortunately, tens of millions of Americans no longer trust the neo con influenced account of 9/11, and are therefore keeping a watchful eye for government-sponsored domestic terrorism strikes in October 2006 to be used by the Bush Administration to scare enough uninformed voters into voting in favor of keeping the neo con in power and out of jail for two more years.
    For example, on October 2, 2006, the Muckraker Report received an anonymous tip concerning the ConocoPhillips Refinery located at 1400 S. Park Ave. in Linden, NJ. It was reported that employees of this facility have noted “suspicious goings” including unfamiliar cars and vans arriving and departing from a remote section of the facility. Apparently there is a “new” black trailer of unknown purpose in the same area. Also, it has been reported that most if not all the guards that the employees were familiar with have been suddenly replaced with new guards. Rumors around the plant are that the Coast Guard is on heightened alert in the port area of Linden, NJ. Some employees believe that a terror attack will occur on October 9, 2006, and are considering not coming to work on that day. The problem with this sort of information is to whom do you report it? Who do you call to report internal sabotage and a potential terrorist event to be unleashed by elements of our very own government? Think about it.
    There is also some peculiar activity on stock exchanges; a hyper increase in put options similar to the put options placed on the airline industry stocks prior to 9/11. The phenomenal amount of money certain investors made as a result of American Airlines and United Airlines stock prices crashing after 9/11 is another piece of evidence that indicates prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. People that kept silent to reap profit from the death of thousands on September 11, 2001 should be prosecuted. Instead, there appears to be evidence that these insiders, the ruling elite and rich and famous, are preparing once again to profit from anticipated events that will shake the markets, perhaps in October 2006, at the devastating expense of others.
    If a terror attack, staged or real, occurs in the United States of America prior to the November 2006 elections, it will be intentional. If such events unfold, the American people will have to take immediate action. We will not have the luxury of trusting our government any longer. We will have to seize our institutions, and reestablish our lost constitutional republic. Anything less, we will surely regrets for years to come.
    Be alert and prepared. Stay safe.

    Reply

  2. roger says:

    wreck and reckless…

    Reply

  3. Pissed Off American says:

    “Damn it son, are you snortin’ meth again?”

    Reply

  4. Jaded says:

    Noooooo …. Toonsis … Ohhhhhhh …

    Reply

  5. susan says:

    “I’m the decider, and I decide what is best.”

    Reply

  6. ET says:

    Hang on, Pop. It’s Bin Laden.

    Reply

  7. Carroll says:

    From bits I have read from “State of Denial”, George’s “issues” with his father play a part in his decisions. Seems he wants to prove Bush I’s prior policies wrong in every way possible in order to establish his own manhood. I don’t remember the exact quote from the book but it alluded to Bush getting a rush from “sticking it to his father” by one of his choices in appointments.
    I am not a shrink and I know it has been written about before but it really does seem Bush II has some real weird mamma’s boy problems.

    Reply

  8. sdemetri says:

    “Just shut up, I’m stayin the course!”

    Reply

  9. susan says:

    Stop, Georgie, STOP! You’re driving us over a cliff!

    Reply

  10. betty boop says:

    Wait! There they are. I told ya!

    Reply

  11. lugbolt says:

    Remember…41 was “out of the loop” in the Iran-Contra affair. Like father, like son.

    Reply

  12. Mark Adams says:

    Pricedless Pix
    How ’bout:
    “Look out for that …..
    Tree.”

    Reply

  13. blogenfreude says:

    “Rummy told me the WMD are buried in the next fairway.”

    Reply

  14. Fcb says:

    “Bwwwrrrrrwwwwwrrrwwww…”

    Reply

  15. Punchy says:

    This screams for a caption contest. I’ll start with:
    “That’s not ’10 o’clock and 2 o’clock’, Georgie!”

    Reply

  16. Anwar al-NASCAR says:

    So this would be, driving Ms. Doozy? The blind driving the blind? Two blind duffers? One dummy driving a second dummy to distraction? Driving sanity around a bend in the ninth fairway? Driving home the scenario that, one Bush is bad and two is positively genocidal?

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *