Zone of Instability: Cairo Bomb, Lahore IED

-

ullman jones.jpgThis is a guest note by Harlan Ullman, Chairman of the Killowen Group that advises leaders of government and business and Senior Advisor at Washington, D.C.’s Atlantic Council. (photo courtesy of UPI)
Two ticking packages slipped into the White House. One is the situation in Egypt that, if not handled carefully especially in Cairo as well as in Washington, could be the bomb that explodes the Middle East. The other package is IED-like —-an improvised explosive device lurking in Lahore. If that goes off, the U.S.-Pakistani relationship will be irreversibly damaged.
The massive protests in Egypt have captured world attention. The many tens of thousands of Egyptians gathering in and around Tahrir Square demanding that President Hosni Mubarak must go is indeed a real revolution. But the consequences of these protests both for the here and now and for the long-term cannot even be guessed.
Pakistan is quite opposite from Egypt in that the pending crisis revolves around a single individual, not tens of thousands of Pakistanis. Yet, these consequences could prove as disastrous for the U.S. and Pakistan as would uncontrollable events in Egypt. Thus far, swamped by media fixation on Egypt, the arrest of an American diplomat in Lahore two weeks ago on charges of killing two Pakistanis along with possessing an illegal weapon has not become a cause celebre here yet.
What is happening and could happen in Egypt has predictably provoked incessant commentary and opinion. For the moment, events seem to be unfolding in a positive direction because of discussions on forming a transition government now including members of the opposition and the intention of ending emergency rule. However, fragility reigns. And a single spark could ignite this political bombshell.
The Pakistani IED is different. Two weeks ago, an American named Raymond Davis was arrested in Lahore in the shooting of two Pakistanis. Davis claimed the two attempted to hold him up at gunpoint and that he acted in self-defense. A third Pakistani was also killed when a back up car from the U.S. Consulate reportedly rushed to Davis’ aid and hit a civilian motorcyclist.
The U.S., at all levels of government, immediately claimed diplomatic immunity for Mr. Davis, demanding his immediate release and unequivocally supported his claim of self-defense. Then, the problems started and the crisis escalated reflecting the huge divide between the two strategic partners and the vast anti-American hostility sadly shared by a great majority of Pakistanis.
As an accredited diplomat, the Vienna Convention of 1961 guarantees Mr. Davis immunity. From the U.S. and international law perspectives, the case is ironclad and there have been numerous egregious examples where diplomats have been protected by immunity.
Unfortunately, technicalities in procedure and in Pakistani law have kept Davis in custody. It appears that Pakistan did not draft the Vienna Convention into their law. And the U.S. may not have listed Davis as immunized in documentation to the Pakistani foreign ministry.
But the explosive forces in this IED are not these legal technicalities. They are the politics of Pakistan. Punjab is the power base for PML-N, the leading opposition to the ruling PPP with Lahore its headquarters. The police technically come under the province. And both provincial and federal courts are fiercely independent of the federal government.
Pakistanis are enraged over this incident and the killing of a third person with the driver allegedly escaping into the sanctuary of the Consulate. Worse, the widow of one of the victims just committed suicide. Any Pakistani government official who intervenes on behalf of Davis will attract public ire and possible retaliation. The recent assassination of Punjab Governor Salmaan Taseer for taking a strong stand against the blasphemy laws will not be forgotten.
One of many fuses to this IED is the Pakistani media, filled with all sorts of ludicrous conspiracy theories accusing Davis of being everything from James Bond to Machine Gun Kelly. The U.S. has its “birther” stories about President Barack Obama being foreign born. Pakistani media are far more irresponsible. For example, the Jang press has repeatedly reported President Asif Zardari’s secret marriage to a Pakistani-American doctor. The story has been denied by the lady who never met the president as well as the grounds for a suit filed against the company by an attorney acting for Mr. Zardari.
The White House is understandably playing hardball over this. The bilateral meeting between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Pakistan Foreign Minister S.M. Qureshi was cancelled and Zardari’s state visit could hang in the balance. The already strained relationship will deteriorate further.
The White House knows that only the Egyptians can defuse their bomb and Pakistanis their IED over the detention of Mr. Davis. In the former, that will take a very long time. A new government and the emergence of new political parties as well as repairing the economy take time. In the latter crisis, Pakistani politics are the inhibitors.
But make no mistake: unless both bombs are defused, the damage will be incalculable.
— Harlan Ullman

Comments

3 comments on “Zone of Instability: Cairo Bomb, Lahore IED

  1. Carroll says:

    Davis a diplomat?
    Oh plezzzze!
    The guy is a hired goon on a $200,00 yr contract from a storefront security company.
    Worse, he is stupid.
    Tooling around with a car load of weapons he shoots two Pak security guys in the back…yes ..in the back.
    I wouldn’t have this white knuckled, trigger happy incompetent as a yard boy, he’d probably shoot the water sprinklers.
    Let this yahoo cowboy rot in jail.
    The question is how the hell did this nutcase get hired to begin with…as a favor to who?

    Reply

  2. Don Bacon says:

    I don’t usually comment on the thoughtfulness of a diary, but this is surely an amateurish piece of work.
    Raymond Davis is as much a diplomat as I am. The much deeper US/Pakistan enmity, in a country where the US is universally hated, goes much deeper to the US tilt toward Pakistan arch-enemy India as I commented on a previous thread.
    So Pakistan is on, at the least, a par with Egypt as a problem for the US, if not worse.
    Because — hellooo — there’s a war going on over there called AfPak, a war that pits the US against Afghans and Paks. The US has been killing them before Davis was, which is one reason (there are others) why they hate us.

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *