Musings on a Saturday Flight

-

Sometimes I just want to write quick-blip reactions to stuff I see out there.
Here are some things that caught my attention on the way back from Mexico City today:

1. Televisa and Bill Gates have announced that they are going to work through his investment arm, Cascade Investment — along with Bain Capital, the Blackstone Group, Carlyle Group, and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. — to bid for Univision. There is probably some serious regulatory requirement that mandates such a disclosure, but on another front, it seems anti-competitive for someone of Bill Gates’ economic weight to publicly say, “I’m here. My team is big. I want your company — all others beware.”
2. I should have bought gold. Gold passed $727 an ounce on Friday. Richard Fisher, who previously ran for the Senate in Texas and then served as Deputy US Trade Representative in the Clinton administration, is now President & CEO of the Federal Reserve Board of Dallas. Two years ago, Fisher told a small group that he was putting a big chunk of his considerable wealth into gold. When a guy who is a regional Fed Board chairman elects to abandon the dollar and other securities for gold, we should listen have listened.
3. I like Richard Falkenrath who had a piece today in the Washington Post celebrating the NSA national phone call data base project. But this irks me:

There are, of course, strict legal limits on the ability of federal agencies such as the NSA to compel the provision of domestic information or to collect it secretly. The USA Today story, however, alleges that three telecommunications companies — AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth — provided it voluntarily. How else could one company (Qwest) decline to provide the information? Since there is no prohibition against federal agencies receiving voluntarily provided business records relating to their responsibilities, it appears that the NSA’s alleged receipt and retention of such information is perfectly legal.

But go check out the Quest story. They felt seriously strong-armed by the government to comply. I would even say “threatened”. The question to ask AT&T, Verizon and Bell South in the inevitable hearings ahead will be how “voluntary” were their actions? How threatened did they feel?
4. Recently, I screened for a group of 200 people the pre-release of
Our Brand is Crisis” which looks into the political terrain in Bolivia preceding the rise of Evo Morales. There were a lot of anti-globalist Morales supporters there, and I would imagine that most of them would applaud Morales’s May 1st announcement that he would nationalize its gas sector and offer oil firms six months to renegotiate their contracts.
But Morales has gone further and declared that Bolivia may not compensate firms for the assets they hold in Bolivia if nationalized. Brazil is outraged — particularly if Brazil’s Petrobras, the largest foreign investor in Brazil, is not compensated.
Some bad stuff is unfolding in Latin America, and I don’t have any sense that Americans are paying much attention. My New America Foundation colleague, Jim Pinkerton agrees.

More later.
— Steve Clemons

Comments

26 comments on “Musings on a Saturday Flight

  1. phetermine says:

    I have the pleasure to visiting your site.

    Reply

  2. Real Estate India says:

    In India there is this painkiller called brufin(400mg) that is apparently banned in all other countries but easily available in any chemist here in India. There are doctors too that recommend it sometimes. I guess only because of its addictive nature is it banned. But I do not get why it still available so freely in India.

    Reply

  3. voyeurismo says:

    The doctor gave me once codeine when I was sick, had cough and mucus in my lungs or something like it, I got better very quickly, it’s a great medicine, altough you can’t just buy it, a doctor must give it to you.

    Reply

  4. Hydrocodone for sale says:

    3 codeine medication
    codeine medication
    tylenol generic
    buy norco dosage
    xanax generic online
    buy online vicodin
    online hydrocodone
    3 codeine medication is a popular American brand of drugs for relieving pain, reducing fever, and relieving the symptoms of allergies, cold, cough, flu, sold by Johnson & Johnson. Its original, flagship product, acetaminophen, is marketed for headaches, fever, muscle and body pain, arthritis, and joint pain. It is available without prescription and has few side effects. In addition to products related to allergies and cold, 3 codeine medication also sells a stronger pain reliever containing codeine.
    3 codeine medication is a narcotic pain medication that contains both 3 codeine medication (acetaminophen) and Codeine. The 3 means that there are three grains of 3 codeine medication combined with 500 milligrams of acetaminophen. Codeine is a prescription strength narcotic pain reliever and 3 codeine medication is a very effective over-the-counter medicine. When the two are mixed, the pain relief is greater than if only one was taken.
    3 codeine medication was discovered by David W. Young, a graduate of Covington Latin School and the University of Kentucky, while working on chemical patents at Standard Oil of Ohio in Cleveland, Ohio.
    3 codeine medication was introduced in 1955 by J&J subsidiary McNeil Consumer Products Co. as one of the first alternatives to aspirin, which at that time was being shown to have some negative health effects. There is a wide array of different varieties of 3 codeine medication available today including extra-strength, children’s doses, longer-lasting, and sleep aiding. In 2005, 3 codeine medication Ultra was introduced, containing 500 mg of acetaminophen, the same dosage as Extra Strength 3 codeine medication , but also including 65 mg of caffeine. The patent on paracetamol has expired, and the continued success of 3 codeine medication brand preparations is largely due to marketing, the backing of Johnson & Johnson, and new patented delivery mechanisms such as quick-release and extended-release forms of the medication.
    On September 29, 1982, a 3 codeine medication scare began when the first of seven individuals died in metropolitan Chicago, Illinois, after ingesting Extra Strength 3 codeine medication that contained cyanide. While the crime was never solved and 3 codeine medication sales temporarily collapsed, the brand was rebuilt and recovered in only a few years.
    3 codeine medication remains a top seller, controlling about 35% of the pain killer market in North America.
    In 2006, studies showed that recommended doses of 3 codeine medication can cause elevation in liver enzymes in healthy adults.
    3 codeine medication products sells products to relieve pain, allergies, and cold- and flu- related symptoms. All of the 3 codeine medication brand products contain acetaminophen. Allergy and cold products also contain dextromethorphan, pseudoephedrine, and other nasal decongestants, antihistamines, and expectorants. A class of stronger pain relievers contains 3 codeine medication.
    You can find more information: http://www.crdrx.com

    Reply

  5. Charl Marais says:

    Thanks for the resources

    Reply

  6. popup blocker says:

    Hi, very interesting site. I really like it.
    http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/aim_blocker_pop_up/ aim blocker pop up http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/close_popup_window/ close popup window http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/aol_blocker_free_pop_up/ aol blocker free pop up http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/bike_rack_for_pop_up_camper/ bike rack for pop up camper http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/block_popup_software/ block popup software http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/used_pop_up_camper_for_sale/ used pop up camper for sale http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/popup_ads_killer/ popup ads killer http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/coleman_pop_up_camper_part/ coleman pop up camper part http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/pop_up_trade_show_booth/ pop up trade show booth http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/ad_popup/ ad popup http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/adult_finder_friend_popup/ adult finder friend popup http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/officialhomepage_popup/ officialhomepage popup http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/download_popup_pro_stopper/ download popup pro stopper http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/camper_popup_sale_used/ camper popup sale used http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/stop_popup_free/ stop popup free http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/free_popup_software/ free popup software http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/popup_killer_download/ popup killer download http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/download_free_guard_popup/ download free guard popup http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/pop_up_camping_tent/ pop up camping tent http://stop-popups.awardspace.com/ad_blocker_pop_popup_up/ ad blocker pop popup up

    Reply

  7. justme says:

    Chavez is dangerous — but he’s aiming at our government, not the people. I would encourage anyone curious about Chavez to view the film “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”. (http://www.chavezthefilm.com/index_ex.htm)
    I think the strategy of a large group of countries is to change the way money works. Remove the USD as the reserve currency of the world, and the perverted interests that structure serves. If that happens, I think it might not only benefit the world, but the majority of Americans as well.
    I did my research back in 2003 and came to the same conclusion as Mr Fisher. I put 20% of my assets in gold. The rest in energy, commodities, and foreign currencies. Not a bad strategy.

    Reply

  8. James Monroe says:

    Mr. Clemons, your defense of American imperial domination of Latin America is touching. And yes you’re right, those little peasants should NEVER gain control of their own resources! They must learn that the United States is The Decider when it comes to how the natural resources they’re standing on is to be used. Morales better watch out otherwise we might have to “democratize” his shitty little country and “liberate” its natural gas reserves.
    Monroe Doctrine 2006, biyatch. westside.

    Reply

  9. the exile says:

    I just love the irony that the main opponent of the Bolivian gas nationalization is Petrobras, which was born in the early 1950s as a STATE monopoly when Getulio Vargas nationalized the foreign oil companies working in Brazil.

    Reply

  10. Mona Lyne says:

    This guy cannot know much about Latin America. The idea that Bachelet in Chile is anti-capitalist and determined to reverse globalization is completely ridiculous. Anyone who has the slightest knowledge of LA knows this is silly. Although it is not quite as obvious in the case of Chile, the same can be said of Lula in Brazil or the likely winner of the Mexican elections this year from the PRD. Lula’s govt in Brazil has maintained a macroeconomic policy and a trade policy even more liberal than his predecessor, who was supposedly center right. Please!!!!!!!!

    Reply

  11. gail says:

    I don’t think that many of you understand that the whole world is conspiring to cut America down to size; they are all against us! And we must defend ourselves whether it be against terrorists, communists, socialists, liberals, anti-captialists, enviromentalists (which is a disguise for all the beforementioned), pagans, isalmofacists, free-lovers, rainbow coalition, etc., etc., etc. They are all constantly trying to decay the American way of life, and Pinkerton is in the forefront of those protecting American values. God Bless America!

    Reply

  12. Dirk says:

    Where to start…
    Gee Steve, a lot of us are keenly aware of what is going on in S. America (or America as they prefer to call it), including the developments in Venezuela, Bolivia and even the Sheraton Hotel in Mexico City.
    I sincerely hope that Pinkerton doesn’t represent the prevalent views at New America. Most of the changes occuring in S. America are positive and represent a sort of declaration of independence to the Monroe doctrine.
    It may come as news to Pinkerton, but Brazil has recently started enriching its own “yellowcake” rather than ship it to Europe for that purpose.

    Reply

  13. Nell says:

    one of these days a Latin country will emerge as a serious military power, thus ending America’s fortuitous two-century-long monopoly of force in this hemisphere.
    Yeah, that’d be tragic for the hemisphere, because our domination has had such a positive impact.
    Where to start with this kind of fatuity? It requires that we all just pretend that a century of military, economic, and political intervention on behalf of U.S. corporations and local elites never happened. The many thousands of people disappeared, slaughtered, imprisoned and tortured… “fortuitous” indeed. And they’re dwarfed by the millions just plain robbed — doomed to grinding poverty in a rigged system.
    To the Pinkertons of the world, people everywhere else are just not quite as real, as fully human, as U.S. citizens. Thus the only grounds for paying the region any mind at all are(bogus) national security concerns.
    If Pinkerton is typical of New America Foundation thinking, there’s nothing New about the America you all are envisioning. Same old empire.

    Reply

  14. Farinata X says:

    I like and respect you, Steve, but I must differ with you. Some of the most encouraging developments to occur anywhere on the planet lately are those taking place in Latin America. Bravo Evo!

    Reply

  15. blog101 says:

    Regarding the price of gold. Yes, you should have bought a year ago. No, you shouldn’t buy now, as the price is about to peak.
    —————–
    blog101.org: http://www.blog101.org
    myblogclub.org: http://www.myblogclub.org
    —————–

    Reply

  16. bakho says:

    Does anyone seriously think that the Bush administration would collect all this information and NOT use it for poltical purposes?
    Has Bush been so secretive, reluctant to disclose and resistant to oversight because he used this information in his campaign against John Kerry?
    Where is the proof to the contrary? The word of a president that Americans no longer trust is not good enough.

    Reply

  17. Aunt Deb says:

    As one of those attending the preview of “Our Brand Is Crisis”, I just want to say I was not so much pro-Morales as I was anti-Carville, Greenberg, et al spinning the shit out the political and economic problems facing Bolivians in an effort to ‘earn’ their consultancy fees from their candidate/client. For all the calculatedness of the consultants — and of the filmmaker — there was a stunning amount of naivete that seemed to derive from something fundamentally vapid in the way these Americans view their right to be morally superior.
    Many Americans like to think that their willingness to suspend the work of judgement is simply the necessary foundation for the pragmatism that produces results. But political consultants can’t pretend that they haven’t made a judgement, that they are a sort of net neutral element in the situation.
    Regarding the presumed dangers awaiting us in South America, perhaps we should not be so ignorant of the deliberate and covert meddling we have done and continue to do there. And I include the work of American political consultants in this category.

    Reply

  18. profmarcus says:

    supporting morales does not automatically equate with anti-globalism… morales could be the first opportunity the impoverished people of bolivia have had to re-assert control over their own country and their own resources in the several centuries that they have been mercilessly exploited by foreign interests… (i do not count any previous nationalization efforts for the simple reason that they were undertaken principally to enrich the local oligarchs at the expense of the vast bulk of the population…)
    read this nyt editorial from 6 may…
    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/06/opinion/06powers.html?th&emc=th
    i say “could be” because the jury is still out… morales is feeling his way… so far, he has stated bolivia will not impede the profitability of the operators who choose to stay… that may change if the coterie of foreign “economic hit men” shadowing his every step manage to have their wicked way with him…
    i believe that morales believes that he is sending a strong signal that the rape and pillage of his country’s sovereign resources must end… this is a signal that deserves to be paid attention to by the rest of the world, particularly those countries bound and determined to extract the last drop of blood from the emaciated carcasses of their client nations (equatorial guinea, name-your-middle-east country, the congo, half of the ” ‘stans,” etc…
    i’m rooting for evo…
    http://takeitpersonally.blogspot.com/

    Reply

  19. Marica says:

    “Some bad stuff is unfolding in Latin America, and I don’t have any sense that Americans are paying much attention. My New America Foundation colleague, Jim Pinkerton agrees.”
    Bad for whom? The tried policy used in South America is now being tried on the rest of the world. How calmly people talk about overthrowing governments, bombing, even nuking–looking at the past that is just the way we do things. Soprano like–this is business.

    Reply

  20. vachon says:

    Good grief. Any day now I expect to be told that boogabooga! Monaco has been training (really well dressed) assassins.

    Reply

  21. Ducktape says:

    Of course we’re not paying any attention, Steve. No one has yet told us that the boogeyman we’re supposed to be afraid of is in Latin America, unless he’s trying to sneak across the border to take a job cleaning WalMart.
    You mean there’s something else?

    Reply

  22. elementary teacher says:

    In January, nominee Hayden appeared before the National Press Club in D.C. and, while emoting some degree of zeal about his knowledge of the Fourth Amendment in response to a reporter’s question, appeared to be patently unfamiliar with actual “probable cause” language contained therein. Should Hayden be chosen, as you indicated, to “restore morale” in the CIA? I’m trying to follow your logic, especially given the climate where politicians and security services examine their own work in secret and subsequently find themselves not to blame — all the while accessing the private phone call data bases of U.S. citizens.
    Fourth Amendment:
    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. ”

    Reply

  23. Patience says:

    It seems from the second round of reporting that the phone companies didn’t provide the data totally voluntarily but rather some money changed hands.

    Reply

  24. S Brennan says:

    The NSA national phone call data base project makes sense when you view in this light:
    The Modern Republican Party is a bunch of snooping blackmailers, their policies run against public opinion…so, in order to enact them they smear/skewer everybody that gets in their way.
    Here’s some examples from recent history, ‘cuse me if I miss somebody:
    Valerie Plame,
    Mr Nacchio,
    Mr Rice,
    Mary McCarthy,
    Rep. Murtha,
    John Kerry,
    Gore,
    Bob Kerry…
    Modern Republicans think everybody plays dirty…because they do…here’s an example:
    May 12, 2006 — The former prosecutor who succeeded Independent Counsel Ken Starr in the probe of the Clintons’ failed Whitewater real estate investment that ended by probing his sexual relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky has been charged with stalking an ex-girlfriend, a law enforcement official said.
    Robert Ray surrendered to cops last night after Manhattan resident Tracy Loughlin, 40, filed a complaint.
    “She tried to end it four months ago, but he kept calling her, sending her e-mails and showing up at places he knew she would be,” the official said.
    Ray, 46, was charged with fourth-degree stalking, given a desk-appearance ticket and freed. Ray is now in private practice and lives in Long Branch, N.J.

    Reply

  25. John says:

    Sadly your chum Mr. Pinkerton is deeply entrenched in the scare the kids meme, OMG ‘they’ are going to threaten ‘us’ with nukes in the future when the exceedingly harsh reality out there is that ‘we’ are threatening everyone else with nukes now. And ‘they’ are taking ‘our’ assets? He must be joking. How does he imagine ‘we’ earned those assets? Through the equivalent work of a Bolivian peasant?
    If only for perspective, Steve, split this post into #s 1 through 3 and separate #4 and then tell us what you really think.

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *